[Independent Verification] Will the Secure Boot issue brick your graphics card in 2026? We asked official Microsoft support directly.

Recently, a scary rumor has been circulating among PC builders and gamers that "the old Secure Boot certificate (Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011) will expire in June 2026, causing PCs to stop booting due to graphics cards."

We have been conducting verification on this blog, and after extracting the VBIOS of the "RTX 3060" that I use and performing binary analysis, we discovered that the rumored old certificate was being used.

"If this continues, will my PC not be able to start up in 2026?"

To clarify this question,I contacted Microsoft directly through their official support chat to find out the truth.

In conclusion,RTX 3060 users, rest assured. However, those using some older graphics cards, especially the early GTX 16 series, should be very careful.

table of contents

Summary of answers from Microsoft Support (quick reference)

I have compiled a table showing the "impact of each graphics card generation" that I discovered during my lengthy discussion with the support staff.

ItemA modern GPU (such as an RTX 3060)Older GPUs (GTX 600 to early GTX 16, etc.)
Launch date: June 2026 or laterCan be started without any problemsSecure Boot initialization may fail
Worst-case scenarioNo impactBlack screen before BIOS and completely unbootable
Effects of the NVIDIA DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 Firmware Update Tool(Not applicable or not affected)Invalid(UEFI GOP and signatures are not updated at all)
Future measuresNo need to replace or change anythingCheck with the manufacturer for firmware updates, or consider replacing the device.

Three key facts revealed

We'll explain the specific technical answers we received from Microsoft support professionals.

1. The RTX 3060 won't become "unbootable"

In response to my most concerning question, "Will RTX 3060s with old certificates become bricked in 2026?", support gave me a clear, safe response: "No, your RTX 3060 will not become unbootable," and "Your RTX 3060 is not included in that group, so there is no need to replace anything."

The catastrophic Secure Boot violation scenario only applies to "certain older NVIDIA GPUs," as described below.

Additionally, a reader reported (March 6, 2026) that Microsoft support has responded that the Palit RTX 3050 6GB, released in February 2024, is not affected by Microsoft UEFI CA 2023 and does not require verification.

I want to read it together
How to check the version and expiration date of Windows Secure Boot certificate Do you have Secure Boot enabled on your Windows 10/11 PC? In fact, some of the certificates currently used on many PCs will begin to expire in 2026. This...

2. The real danger lies in the "GTX 600 to early GTX 16 series"

After 2026, cards that Microsoft classifies as "older NVIDIA GPUs" are at serious risk of experiencing a black screen and other "boot failure" issues. According to a support response, specifically: GTX 600 series to early GTX 16 series falls into this category.

It makes sense that the 10 series, including the GTX 600, 900, and the famous GTX 1060, are included, but the most important thing to be wary of here is"The initial lot of the GTX 16 series" is also included.The GTX 16 series (GTX 1650, 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 SUPER, etc.) was released around 2019 and is a huge hit model with many active users, still ranking highly in Steam's hardware survey.

At this point, one question may arise: "My RTX 3060 also has an internal signature from 2011, so why is it safe?"

According to Microsoft, "modern GPUs" like the RTX 3060 are exceptionally protected (no replacement required) because of their new hardware design. However, the GTX 16 series, "products manufactured at the beginning of its release," still use the old firmware (UEFI GOP) from that time, and therefore fall outside the scope of this new protection.

Late-production models and those with VBIOS fixes already applied by the manufacturer may be safe. However, for those who bought early models immediately after release and have continued to use them, unless the manufacturer provides new firmware, they run the risk of losing access to the BIOS in June 2026 due to a Secure Boot violation.

It is important to note that there are cases where manufacturers explain that "old certificates will continue to be recognized, so it's okay," but this does not include the pitfall of "registration to the DBX (ban list)."

In addition to the list of allowed signatures (DB), Secure Boot also has a forbidden list (DBX) that clearly states, "This signature will no longer be trusted." The real horror of the update scheduled for 2026 is that Microsoft will forcefully update this DBX through Windows Update.

Even if the signature inside the graphics card is technically "valid," once that signature (Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011) itself is registered in DBX, the PC's boot process (UEFI) will immediately block it as an "invalid device."

In other words, the following worst-case scenario becomes a reality:

  1. Windows Update will be performed: The DBX (ban list) in the PC will be updated.
  2. Reboot: UEFI checks the GPU signature but rejects it because it is registered in DBX.
  3. Video output stops: The GPU firmware (GOP) does not work, and the screen turns completely black, with not even the BIOS screen displayed.

Even if the manufacturer says it will continue to recognize the device, if Microsoft, which controls the OS, decides to reject it with DBX, early lots of devices such as the GTX 16 series, which rely on old signatures, run the risk of being physically unable to boot (becoming bricked).

If the manufacturer does not provide a workaround VBIOS and you are faced with a black screen when updating in 2026, there is only one last resort.

The option is to disable Secure Boot, completely disconnect the PC from the network, and continue using it in a "standalone (offline)" environment.

If you turn off Secure Boot, the UEFI (BIOS) will skip the DBX (ban list) check, and even the GPU that was supposed to be rejected will be able to display the screen again. However, this means that you are throwing away the fundamental protection of the OS, which means that you will be vulnerable to viruses and rootkits.

Therefore, if you take this measure, the golden rule is to cut off all internet connections and use it as a "dedicated machine that is out of the reach of external threats." "Use your beloved old hardware until it physically breaks, regardless of the lifespan of the OS or changes in Microsoft policy." This is literally the last and strongest self-defense measure available to users who have been abandoned by the manufacturer.

3. The official "DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 Firmware Update Tool" is not a solution

If you wonder if you can update the firmware of your old graphics card, and search for "GTX 1060 UEFI firmware update" or "NVIDIA BIOS not displaying update" on Google, you will find the official "DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 Firmware Update ToolYou should find a page titled "

However, when I asked Microsoft directly, they completely dismissed the issue, saying, "No, this tool only updates the DP firmware and does not change the Secure Boot certificate signature." In other words, even if using this tool appears to temporarily fix the screen problem, it does not fundamentally solve the 2026 problem (updating the digital signature), and it cannot prevent Secure Boot violations.

What people with old graphics cards should do now

If you or someone you know is using a graphics card such as the GTX 1060 or the original GTX 1660, will they have no choice but to buy a new PC by 2026?

According to the support response, it is not necessarily necessary to immediately purchase a new one.The best way to check compatibility is to check with your PC or motherboard manufacturer."It seems that

If your graphics card manufacturer (such as ASUS or MSI) or your build-to-order PC manufacturer provides a firmware update that includes the new certificate for your system, you can survive by applying it.

However, if the manufacturer's support has already ended and you are unable to update the firmware, you will be forced to choose between turning off Secure Boot to lower security or replacing your graphics card by June 2026.

Here, please note thatThe option to "turn off Secure Boot" comes with a significant cost (risk) that goes beyond simply reducing security.Specifically, the following three fatal problems may occur:

  1. Popular games become unplayable Powerful anti-cheat systems (such as Riot Vanguard) used in games like VALORANT and League of Legends require Secure Boot to be enabled in a Windows 11 environment. The moment you turn it off, these games will not launch at all, which is a real blow to gamers.
  2. Excluding Windows 11 system requirements Enabling Secure Boot is a mandatory requirement for Windows 11. If you continue to operate with it disabled, it may cause problems with the OS, such as preventing future major updates (24H2, 25H2, etc.) from being applied properly or displaying a warning watermark on the screen.
  3. Become a target for malicious malware You will lose your strongest defense against "bootkits" and "rootkits," viruses that infect before the OS boots and are extremely difficult to remove.

In other words, the solution of "extending life by turning off Secure Boot" is not available in the modern PC environment.It's not a realistic optionIf you are unable to get an update from the manufacturer, the safest and most reliable solution would be to simply replace your graphics card.

[Risks of turning off Secure Boot]

What is a rootkit?

It means a "kit (toolbox)" for seizing "root (root = administrator privileges)."

  • What to do?: It penetrates deep into the core of the system (kernel, etc.)"Invisible" and conceal the presence of yourself and other viruses international success.
  • Specific damage:
    • It creates a "backdoor" that allows hackers to break into your PC at any time.
    • Secretly steals passwords and credit card information as you enter them (keylogger).
    • It bypasses or disables the detection of normal antivirus software (such as Windows Defender).

What is a Bootkit?

This is a more vicious "evolution" of rootkits. As the name "Boot" suggests,Before Windows (OS) starts upand it starts moving.

  • What to do?: It infects the motherboard firmware (UEFI/BIOS) and the boot area of ​​the hard disk.
  • Specific damage:
    • Boot before the OS: It takes over the system before Windows or antivirus software wakes up, fooling the security software into thinking that "everything is normal" and leaving the infection completely unaware.
    • Reinstalling the OS doesn't fix it: Even if you format (initialize) the C drive containing Windows and reinstall the OS, the virus will reappear because it has infected the motherboard or other parts.

Why do we need "Secure Boot"?

Secure Boot is the most powerful gatekeeper that Microsoft has developed to prevent infection by this boot kit at the very border.

If Secure Boot is turned on, it checks at startup, asking, "Do you have a legitimate signature (identification)?" and blocks the startup of mysterious programs (bootkits) that do not have a signature.

In other words, to continue using your old graphics cardTurning off Secure Boot is like firing the gatekeeper and opening the door wide to the most vicious viruses.

Summary

This direct interview with Microsoft provided a clear answer to the vague concerns on the Internet.

  • RTX 30 Series and later users: You can continue to use it with confidence.
  • For GTX 16 series and earlier users: Check the support page of your PC/graphics card manufacturer to see if there are any firmware updates (especially if you are using the early lot GTX 16 series).

There are only a few months left until the June 2026 deadline.

We hope that the answer from support this time will be of some help to you. Please check your PC environment and manufacturer's support status now so that you don't panic in an emergency.

If you found this article helpful, please share it on social media.

Person who wrote this article

Driven by questions arising from my daily PC use and the desire to "do more," I have been pursuing self-study in Windows since around 2008. I am sharing the "aha!" techniques and solutions I discovered through trial and error with the sole purpose of helping you in your PC life.

View profile

Comment:

Comment list (22)

  • This is my first time commenting.
    I also have an ASUS graphics card with a GTX 1060, which I keep as a backup. It's currently replacing the RTX 3060 that was previously in my main PC (which had a GA104 chip instead of the original GA106, and it seems to have been a defective unit that frequently caused problems and was eventually retired).
    ASUS has still not made any announcements regarding a VBIOS update for the graphics card, and with the deadline approaching, I'm getting anxious.

    • LGA774

      thank you for your comment.

      It seems your main RTX 3060 is malfunctioning, and your backup GTX 1060 is currently serving as a replacement.
      We understand your concerns regarding the upcoming 2026 Secure Boot specification change (the expiration of the UEFI CA 2011 certificate), as there are many uncertainties about whether manufacturers such as ASUS will provide VBIOS updates for older graphics cards.

      There is still time before the deadline, so I think the best course of action is to wait for official announcements from Microsoft and the various manufacturers.

  • Since the initial version of the problematic GTX 1660 was released in February 2019, does that mean the RTX 2000 series, which hasn't been discussed much until now, is from an earlier period? Unless the manufacturer provides a VBIOS update, can we assume they're all unusable?
    It would be great if there was some tool to check for an "old UEFI GOP," but unfortunately, no such tools or scripts are provided.

    • nkm

      Thank you for your comment. That's a very insightful point.
      As you said, if the GTX 1660 (released in 2019) is the problem, then the RTX 2000 series (initial model) released in the latter half of 2018, just before that, is also on the borderline, making it a very suspicious lineup.

      Unless each vendor provides a VBIOS update, in the worst-case scenario, as you suspect, we cannot rule out the possibility of being affected.
      Currently, the most frustrating thing is that there's no official tool that allows the average user to easily determine if their UEFI GOP version is old enough to be blacklisted. (While GPU-Z can show the UEFI compatibility checkmark, it can't track the specific GOP version or certificates.)

      The most reliable way to find out is to contact the manufacturer.

      • I tried setting up the following environment, updating the BIOS certificate to 2023, and also applying the 2023 update to Windows 11 Home (25H2).
        For the BIOS side, use Mosby; for the Windows side, refer to the following website for instructions.
        https://blog.kaimonojyoz.jp/updating-secure-boot-certificates-on-an-old-computer.html

        CPU: Xeon E3-1240L V3
        MB: H97M-D3H
        Added tpm1.2 module.
        GPU: GF-GT710-E1GB/HS (Released February 2019)
        Secure Boot enabled, BIOS mode is UEFI
        Rufus bypasses MS account creation, but does not bypass TPM or security.
        In this state, disconnect from the network and change the date to 2027 in the BIOS.
        I tried switching to a GTX750Ti (Zotac, released February 2014), and it booted up normally.

        I had assumed that the dbx file in Microsoft Option ROM UEFI CA 2023 would contain older vbois-related information, but I was unable to confirm the symptoms.
        However, since Rufus is involved, it's unclear what kind of shady dealings are taking place.
        I'd like to try it again next time in a slightly different environment.

        • nkm

          Thank you very much for the valuable verification report using actual hardware. I am truly impressed by your initiative in setting up the environment yourself and handling everything from certificate updates to testing. The fact that it booted normally even with older generation graphics cards like the GT710 and GTX750Ti is extremely helpful information for others with similar setups.

          Let me add a few technical points regarding these results.

          Actually, Secure Boot's signature verification (checking the Option ROM) does not depend on the BIOS's system clock (RTC) date. (If it did, the PC would fail to boot if the clock was inaccurate due to a dead battery on the motherboard, for example.)
          Therefore, even if you advance the BIOS clock to 2027, it won't simulate the certificate expiring, and the system will basically boot up as usual.

          The focus of the "2026 problem" regarding the risk of graphics cards becoming unusable is not on the clock speeding up, but rather on whether the old certificate will be included in the new dbx (blacklist) that Microsoft will distribute in the future.
          I hope this will be helpful for future testing. Thank you so much for sharing your valuable hands-on report.

  • Thank you for the valuable information.
    I am currently running Windows 11 Pro 25H2, Intel Core I3-10500F, and Palit RTX 3050 6Gb (released February 2024), and have manually updated the SecureBoot certificate.
    In addition to your information, I would like to report the results of my chat with Microsoft (only the main points).
    Key Points: 1) The NVIDIA RTX 3050 6GB, released in February 2024, is not affected by Microsoft UEFI CA 2023. UEFI CA validation is not required, and it will function normally on systems with UEFI CA 2023 applied.
      2) RTX3050 6GB works fine with Secure Boot enabled and the new UEFI CA certificate.

    • Thank you, SAM, for sharing your valuable actual machine data and official response.

      Specific examples of success with the latest model, released in 2024, will be a great source of reassurance for readers using cards of the same generation.
      I really appreciate the great information you provide to improve the accuracy of the article.

  • After that, the Secure Boot permission signature database (DB) was updated and the reboot was successful.
    I tried using the Windows Secure Boot certificate checker SBCertificateChecker.exe, and I got the following error:
    Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011 – Expiration Date: June 2026
    Microsoft UEFI CA 2023 – Expires June 2038
    Windows UEFI CA 2023 – Expires June 2035
    Microsoft Corporation KEK 2K CA 2023 – Expiry date: March 2038
    Has become.
    So, how far can you safely manipulate the BIOS?

    • Dear Siden,

      Thank you very much for the detailed operation test and checker.

      Judging from the results of the checker, all of the new certificates for 2023 have been successfully registered on the system. The certificate renewal was a complete success, so there are no problems with the motherboard preparations.

      We have the following answers to your questions about future BIOS operations:

      ・About Load Optimized Defaults
      As you tested yourself, the checker still showed the 2023 certificate, which means that the key is protected even if you reset the settings. You can continue to run it as needed.

      ・About switching Secure Boot between enabled and disabled

      As explained in a previous article, when you turn off Secure Boot or change settings, the newly added "2023 Certificate" may be dropped (deleted or forgotten) from the list.

      Windows 11 won't boot? "Secure Boot 2023 Signature" issue and how to create a repair tool

      However, in your environment, this switching operation is likely to be no problem, just like the Load Optimized Defaults mentioned above.

      ・Resetting Secure Boot (initializing the key)
      Do not touch this. If you run an item such as "Clear Secure Boot Keys," the added 2023 certificate will be erased and the system will revert to the old state.

      If you revert to the old state, and the checker shows "2023 version (Windows UEFI CA 2023 signed)", you will not be able to boot due to a Secure Boot violation unless you disable Secure Boot.

      And this is where we get to a very important point.

      As mentioned above, there are no problems with updating the motherboard certificate or setting operations, but as we have previously told you, our biggest concern in your environment is the graphics card you are using.

      As explained in the article's section "2. The GTX 600 to early GTX 16 series are truly dangerous," even if the motherboard's certificate has been updated to the latest 2023 version, if the firmware (UEFI GOP) inside the graphics card remains at the older specifications, it will no longer be covered by the new protection framework.

      As a result, unless a new VBIOS with fixed issues is provided by the manufacturer and applied, there is a serious risk that the system will be deemed to have violated Secure Boot in June 2026, resulting in the system becoming bricked and unable to even display the BIOS screen.

      In other words, while there is no problem with "setting the motherboard" for the time being, the conclusion is that in terms of "whether you can continue to use it safely as before after June 2026," it is highly likely that you will need to adjust your graphics card (either by updating the VBIOS or replacing the device).

      First of all, the first step, the motherboard update, was completed successfully, which is a relief. As for the graphics card, we will need to continue to keep an eye on the manufacturer's progress.

      • [Boot Manager (bootmgfw.efi)]
        – Old version (not signed for 2023)

        -----------------
        [Windows UEFI CA 2023] – Expiration date: June 2035
        [Microsoft UEFI CA 2023] – Expiration date: June 2038
        [Microsoft Option ROM UEFI CA 2023] – Expiration date: October 2038
        *[Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011] – Expiration date: June 2026
        [Microsoft Corporation KEK 2K CA 2023] – Expiration date: March 2038
        This is what happened with the latest checker.

      • I tried Load Optimized Defaults after the Secure Boot Authorized Key Exchange Key (KEK) had been updated, and then after rebooting, the Secure Boot Authorized Signature Database (DB) was updated.
        So, I haven't tried Load Optimized Defaults yet. Is it still okay to do so now (after June)?

  • Secure Boot Authorized Key Exchange Key (KEK) Update
    Successfully installed on 2026/02/27 (Fri)

    After that I restarted the computer and it seems to be fine for now.

    I tried using the Windows Secure Boot certificate checker SBCertificateChecker.exe, and I got the following error:
    Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011 – Expiration Date: June 2026
    Microsoft UEFI CA 2023 – Expires June 2038
    Windows UEFI CA 2023 – Expires June 2035
    Microsoft Corporation KEK 2K CA 2023 – Expiry date: March 2038

    was displayed.
    After that, I went into the BIOS and exited by selecting Load Optimized Defaults → Save & Exit Setup, and it started up successfully.When I used the checker again, the same thing happened.
    Does that mean it's okay for now?

    Now and from June onwards, is it okay to continue Load Optimized Defaults in the current BIOS?
    Is it better not to enable or disable Secure Boot, or is it better to reset Secure Boot? Is there anything I should not do?

  • I translated the reply from the ASUS Global ZenTalk moderator. This is exactly what I meant, but is this okay?

    Regarding your question about whether the BIOS will be updated again:

    According to information provided by Microsoft, Secure Boot keys are proactively updated by Microsoft through Windows Update, so a BIOS update is not required. For more information, see the Windows Secure Boot Certificate Expiration and Certificate Renewal page.
    Please see (https://www.asus.com/support/faq/1055903/).

    If you see a "Secure Boot Violation" message on startup, please refer to the following troubleshooting guide: [Notebook] Troubleshooting - Secure Boot Violation Error on Startup
    https://www.asus.com/support/faq/1042711/

    We hope you will continue to use ASUS products in the future.

    ** The contents of the webpage were translated from English using GPT and the Japanese version uploaded to cloud storage is now available for reference.
    Please forgive any grammatical errors. https
    ://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/a/#/s/BFC00D1D3A8C438AA4F4E42748E0530C4

    • Thank you so much, siden, for sharing the response from ASUS so quickly.

      Regarding ASUS's response, there is a high possibility that they have slightly misunderstood the fundamental problem (or are simply following the manual).
      The problem is that "after the key is updated by Windows Update, the old GPU firmware (GOP) is rejected."

      Laptop (siden's environment):
      Because the GPU's GOP is built into (integrated with) the motherboard's BIOS, unless the PC manufacturer (such as ASUS) creates a new BIOS, there is a high possibility that the screen will stop displaying or other fatal problems will occur.

      Desktop PC:
      Because the GPU is independent, if NVIDIA (or the graphics card manufacturer) releases a "VBIOS update tool," it is likely that users can easily circumvent the issue by running the tool themselves.
      That is why it is extremely important to see what kind of response NVIDIA, the source of this issue, will provide. We will continue to closely monitor NVIDIA's response.

    • Dear Siden,

      Thank you for your comment.

      The GTX 1660 Ti is the pioneering model in the GTX 16 series, released first in February 2019.
      In other words, the model you are using is very likely to be equipped with the "old UEFI GOP (firmware) from the initial lot" that is the issue of concern in this article.

      I'm also curious about the manufacturer's support situation, and I'm currently in the process of contacting NVIDIA directly to ask if they have any plans to provide a general-purpose update tool for the early GTX 16 series models or older legacy GPUs.
      As soon as we receive any official answers or information on specific workarounds that users can take, we will share them through a website article.

        • Dear Siden,

          Thank you for your reply.
          It is very encouraging to hear that siden is also working directly with ASUS.

          We will continue to keep a close eye on this situation, including any moves by manufacturers.
          If you make any further progress, please feel free to share it with us.

          • The other day, I was using the English link of this article to work on Global ZenTalk, but the moderator said,
            I have forwarded the information you provided to the relevant team.
            If there are any updates, I will get back to you immediately.
            We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
            It was.
            Translated into Japanese
            The information you provided has been forwarded to the appropriate team.
            If there are any changes, we will contact you immediately.
            We apologize for any inconvenience.

            So, things are starting to move. Thank you very much.

          • Dear Siden,

            Thank you for reporting this issue. We also appreciate you using the English version of our website.
            The moderator's response that "we have forwarded it to the relevant team" is proof that the problem has been properly escalated to the manufacturer's internal technical department, and is a definite "big step."

            I will continue to follow up on any response from NVIDIA.
            Thank you so much for sharing your valuable progress. We look forward to working with you in the future.

To comment

[About submissions]
We welcome any questions or information regarding the content of the article.
However, please note that content unrelated to the purpose of the article, criticism of specific individuals or organizations, offensive language,Inappropriate wordsComments containing the above may be deleted or made private without notice at the discretion of the administrator.
Please note that spam may be automatically deleted by anti-spam measures.

CAPTCHA


table of contents